Photo of Jody L. Rudman

Jody L. Rudman

A seasoned litigator, Jody is passionate about advocating for healthcare clients who face enforcement and compliance issues – both in and out of the courtroom. Jody has assisted clients across a wide range of industries at investigations, negotiations, mediations, pretrial matters, grand jury proceedings, civil lawsuits, criminal indictments, jury trials, sentencings and appeals.

Contact:Read more about Jody L. Rudman
Cyber security and protection of private information and data concept. Locks on blue integrated circuit. Firewall from hacker attack.

How AI-Powered Attacks, Supply Chain Vulnerabilities, and Regulatory Pressures Are Shaping Cybersecurity Today

In today’s digital-first world, cybersecurity has never been more crucial. Organizations across every industry face a rapidly changing threat landscape, with data breaches growing in frequency and sophistication. Modern attackers leverage advancements in technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), to launch innovative campaigns that challenge traditional defenses. At the same time, supply chain vulnerabilities and increased regulatory scrutiny are raising the stakes for organizations.

2025 has been a landmark year for False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement, marked by record-breaking settlements, evolving legal theories, and a broadening scope of government priorities. The FCA remains one of the federal government’s most potent tools for combating fraud, with billions recovered annually and an ever-expanding reach into new sectors and compliance areas. This roundup synthesizes the year’s most significant developments—drawing on recent case law and shifting enforcement priorities—and provides actionable insights for businesses navigating the FCA landscape.

US Department of Justice Sign

This year, the Department of Justice (DOJ) increased its focus on white-collar crime enforcement in some areas, prioritized new areas, and shifted resources away from others. Many of these changes are reflected in Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti’s May 12, 2025, memorandum to the DOJ’s Criminal Division (Galeotti Memo), which highlighted 10 high-impact areas of white-collar crime for enforcement:[1]

Columns at courthouse entrance

Recent Decisions Signal Growing Minority on Challenges to False Claims Act Constitutionality.

Background

The False Claims Act (“FCA”)’s qui tam provisions—which empower private litigants, known as “relators,” to prosecute claims on the Government’s behalf—continue to face constitutional scrutiny, with recent judicial opinions reviving concerns over whether the provisions violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution. As these challenges gain traction, qui tam defendants should be aware of the evolving legal landscape and the potential implications for FCA defense strategies.

US Department of Justice Sign

On May 12, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced revisions to its Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP). As stated by Matthew Galeotti, head of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, the purpose of the revised CEP is to incentivize companies to “come forward, come clean, reform, and cooperate with the government in efficient investigations…

US Department of Justice Sign

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has made it abundantly clear: healthcare fraud remains at the top of its enforcement priorities for 2025 and beyond. In a May 2025 memorandum, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti outlined the Criminal Division’s renewed commitment to “focus, fairness, and efficiency” in the fight against white-collar crime—with healthcare…

Address Bar

As two defendants in an alleged cryptocurrency fraud case are finding out, what you search for on the internet could find its way into the courtroom and be used against you. The use of internet search history as evidence in federal criminal cases is relatively new. In this case, prosecutors are seeking to introduce defendants’ post-trade internet searches as evidence of fraudulent intent. Their searches allegedly ranged from “top crypto law firms” and “wire fraud statute” to “can your device be searched without a lawyer” and “crypto theft deductible.”

The critical question: should internet search history be admissible as evidence at trial? The answer is far from simple. Defendants generally have moved to exclude them, and the arguments for and against exclusion highlight the complex interplay between relevance, prejudice, ambiguity, and privilege.

White-Collar

The attorneys with Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations, & Compliance practice have launched this blog with one abiding goal: to provide readers with a 360-degree perspective on government enforcement. Our team possesses decades of prosecutorial and agency experience, as well as deep knowledge of how to navigate enforcement actions on behalf of clients. In…