Photo of Kathryn Horvatits

Kathryn Horvatits

Kathryn focuses on healthcare regulatory law, leveraging a unique blend of military and medical experience. Kathryn previously served as an emergency action controller and aerospace medical technician in the U.S. Air Force, roles that honed her ability to handle complex, high-pressure situations. Her interest in law grew out of her military service: she had enjoyed delving into Air Force regulations and using them to argue for and against policy decisions, which naturally led her to the legal field.

On June 24, 2026, Acting Attorney General of the United States Todd Blanche along with other senior government officials and leaders announced “the greatest combined federal and state effort in combating healthcare fraud in history.” The 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown heralded 455 defendants charged across 56 federal districts and 45 states and territories, in connection with more than $6.5 billion in alleged false claims submitted to Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health programs—all in a coordinated two-week window.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has made it abundantly clear: healthcare fraud remains at the top of its enforcement priorities for 2025 and beyond. In a May 2025 memorandum, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti outlined the Criminal Division’s renewed commitment to “focus, fairness, and efficiency” in the fight against white-collar crime—with healthcare

When companies receive their first 2703(d) order from law enforcement, their response is usually a mix of confusion and terror. In the ever-evolving landscape of digital communications, understanding the legal mechanisms that govern data access is crucial. One such mechanism is the 2703(d) order, a powerful tool that law enforcement is using more and more as digital evidence becomes more robust and complex. This post examines the nature of a 2703(d) order and considers its implications for organizations, privacy officers, compliance professionals, and defense counsel.