We’ve just put the wraps on Episode 31 of the False Claims Act Insights podcast where I had a great conversation with longtime healthcare law veterans Brett McNeal and David Traskey covering advisory opinions from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General. We discuss how the highly qualified and sometimes equivocal
The attorneys with Husch Blackwell’s White Collar, Internal Investigations, & Compliance practice have launched this blog with one abiding goal: to provide readers with a 360-degree perspective on government enforcement. Our team possesses decades of prosecutorial and agency experience, as well as deep knowledge of how to navigate enforcement actions on behalf of clients. In
When companies receive their first 2703(d) order from law enforcement, their response is usually a mix of confusion and terror. In the ever-evolving landscape of digital communications, understanding the legal mechanisms that govern data access is crucial. One such mechanism is the 2703(d) order, a powerful tool that law enforcement is using more and more as digital evidence becomes more robust and complex. This post examines the nature of a 2703(d) order and considers its implications for organizations, privacy officers, compliance professionals, and defense counsel.
A recent Sixth Circuit decision[1] provided clarity on the scope of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrines, particularly as those rules relate to confidentiality and privacy of corporate records reviewed and analyzed as part of internal investigations. The decision is considered a victory for both the legal and the business worlds because it secured the longstanding and fundamental function of legal privileges that encourage complete and transparent sharing between attorneys and their corporate clients.